<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<!--templates/rss.tpl.php-->

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Edtags.org: commentary</title>
    <link>http://www.edtags.org/</link>
    
    <description>Recent bookmarks posted to Edtags.org</description>
    <ttl>60</ttl>


    <item>
        <title>11/3/08 - Trust Me: Forum | KQED Public Media for Northern CA</title>
	<link>http://www.kqed.org/epArchive/R811031000</link>
	<description>National surveys show a steady decrease of trust in almost every area of American life. How do we decide who we can trust? And how good are we at judging the trustworthiness of our politicians? We examine the latest psychological research on trust.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>november08</category>
		<category>trust</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>11/08 - Wikipedia and the Meaning of Truth</title>
	<link>http://www.technologyreview.com/web/21558/page1/</link>
	<description>Wikipedia's standard for inclusion has become its de facto standard for truth, and since Wikipedia is the most widely read online reference on the planet, it's the standard of truth that most people are implicitly using when they type a search term into Google or Yahoo. On Wikipedia, truth is received truth: the consensus view of a subject.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>november08</category>
		<category>trust</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>10/21/08 - Margaret Atwood - A Matter of Life and Debt - NYTimes.com</title>
	<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/22/opinion/22atwood.html</link>
	<description>We are social creatures who must interact for mutual benefit, and — the negative version — who harbor grudges when we feel we’ve been treated unfairly. Without a sense of fairness and also a level of trust, without a system of reciprocal altruism and tit-for-tat — one good turn deserves another, and so does one bad turn — no one would ever lend anything, as there would be no expectation of being paid back. And people would lie, cheat and steal with abandon, as there would be no punishments for such behavior.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>october08</category>
		<category>trust</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>A Decade of Internet Evolution - The Internet Protocol Journal, Volume 11, No. 2 - Cisco Systems</title>
	<link>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_11-2/112_evolution.html</link>
	<description>It seems fair to ask how long accessibility of this info is likely to continue. I do not mean that it may be lost from the Internet but, that we may lose the ability to interpret it. Even if we have skirted this problem in the past by rendering info into printed form or microfilm the complexity of digital objects is increasing so it won't be adequate simply to print information.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>august08</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>12/12/07 - Audio Interview: How the Internet Is Changing Education - Chronicle.com</title>
	<link>http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2605&amp;utm_source=wc&amp;utm_medium=en</link>
	<description>John Seely Brown was a computer enthusiast since before most people knew what personal computers were. HIs work as former director of the Xerox Corporation’s famed Palo Alto Research Center landed him in the computer Industry Hall of Fame. I sat down with Mr. Brown at a recent event celebrating the history of NSFNet, a precursor of today’s Internet, and recorded this podcast interview, in which he talks about how computer networks — and now Web 2.0 — are radically changing education.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>december07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>12/11/07 - In Nobel Speech, Doris Lessing Blames the Internet for a Decline in Book Reading - Chronicle.com</title>
	<link>http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2603&amp;utm_source=wc&amp;utm_medium=en</link>
	<description>“We are in a fragmenting culture,” she wrote, “where our certainties of even a few decades ago are questioned and where it is common for young men and women who have had years of education to know nothing about the world, to have read nothing, knowing only some speciality or other, for instance, computers.”</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>december07</category>
		<category>quality</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>9/11/07 - Playing Craps With Copyright? - Chronicle.com</title>
	<link>http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2372</link>
	<description>Mr. Vaidhyanathan, an associate professor of media studies and law at the University of Virginia, argues that Google’s library-scanning project could cause a copyright catastrophe by casting doubt on fair-use doctrine. Fair use is typically threshed out on a case-by-case basis, the scholar says, but Google is asking courts to issue broad rulings on the doctrine</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>september07</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>ownership</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>The banality of blogging or how does the web affect the public-private dichotomy</title>
	<link>http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=165</link>
	<description>Blogging offers then the type of solution to the private/public dichotomy that Arendt dreads. It does not release the passion of private life into the public, but deprives the private of its fascination and invests the public with a continuous repetition of identical personal experiences.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>kdqpp</category>
		<category>august07</category>
		<category>identity</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>8/10/07 - Is There Wisdom in Crowds? - New York Times</title>
	<link>http://select.nytimes.com/iht/2007/08/08/opinion/IHT-08edcohen.1.html?</link>
	<description>Media Predict amounts to a virtual stock market for manuscripts, television pilots, rock bands and the like. Traders with the equivalent of $5,000 in fantasy cash buy shares in the material they believe in. Whatever rises on this prediction market ought in theory to be the things entertainment moguls should buy and back.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>august07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>participation</category>
		<category>collective intelligence</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>7/25/07 - Responding to Responses to: &quot;Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace&quot;</title>
	<link>http://www.danah.org/papers/essays/ResponseToClassDivisions.html</link>
	<description>I'm an academic but I'm also a blogger. For me, these are separate identities. I write formal papers that I spend months trying to find the language to properly express what's going on. [On my blog] I write in an off-the-cuff manner, trying to paint impressions rather than nuance. Unfortunately, many feel as though a blog must be formal &amp; then they project this view onto my writing...</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>july07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>danah boyd</category>
		<category>research</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>7/13/07 - OMG! YR still on MySpace? Loser! - Netiquette - MSNBC.com</title>
	<link>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19735915/</link>
	<description>Negative op-ed about danah boyd's myspace/facebook class division blog.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>july07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>danah boyd</category>
		<category>research</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>6/27/07 - The Whole World Is Watching - New York Times</title>
	<link>http://select.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/opinion/27friedman.html?</link>
	<description>Seidman’s simple thesis is that in this transparent world “how” you live your life and “how” you conduct your business matters more than ever. “The persistence of memory in electronic form makes 2nd chances harder to come by,” writes Seidman. “In the information age, life has no chapters or closets; you can leave nothing behind &amp; you have nowhere to hide your skeletons. Your past is your present.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>june07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>transparency</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>authorship</category>
		<category>participation</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>6/14/07 - The Chronicle: Wired Campus Blog: 'Everyone's Tripping and It's All Free'</title>
	<link>http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=2156</link>
	<description>In two posts on Britannica Blog, Mr. Gorman, fmr pred of American Library Association, has launched a broadside against all of “Web 2.0,” a term applied to a range of Web sites that encourage interaction and collaborative work. “The life of the mind in the age of Web 2.0 suffers,” he writes, “from an increase in credulity and an associated flight from expertise.”</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>june07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>authorship</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>5/30/06 - Edge; DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism By Jaron Lanier</title>
	<link>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html</link>
	<description>Makes an argument against complete faith in collective intelligence by arguing that meta filters (e.g. Wiki) that aggregate many sources of info (many that are anonymous) obscure sources &amp; decontextualize info, which undermines quality &amp; credibility. He acknowledges that collective intelligence can be useful in some instances, but you need both collective &amp; individual intelligence in a society.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>may06</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>credibility</category>
		<category>authorship</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>6/24/07 - apophenia: viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace</title>
	<link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/06/24/viewing_america.html</link>
	<description>What I lay out in this essay is rather disconcerting. Hegemonic American teens (i.e. middle/upper class, college bound teens from upwards mobile or well off families) are all on or switching to Facebook. Marginalized teens, teens from poorer or less educated backgrounds, subculturally-identified teens, and other non-hegemonic teens continue to be drawn to MySpace.</description>
	<dc:creator>katiebda</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>june07</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
    </item>	
	
	

</channel>
</rss>
