Sort by:
  1. Added Jun 08, 2007 by trustteam
    Knowing identities is necessary for a democratic polity. That’s the philosophical argument for using real names and against anonymity (and pseudonymity of the sort where even the organizers don’t know a participant’s identity)....The above arguments contain a philosophical explanation for Wikipedia’s governance problems...
  2. Added Apr 09, 2007 by trustteam
    First, anonymity tends to make people into jerks if they have any tendencies in that direction.
  3. Added Feb 07, 2007 by trustteam and 1 other
    There tends to be this feeling of entitlement that anything someone doesn't like must somehow be "illegal." This is especially true when it comes to anonymous speech -- even more so when it's anonymous speech that's "critical" of someone or some organization.
  4. Added Dec 28, 2006 by katiebda
    So much for the "anonymity" of the web: Researchers have developed new internet security tools that reportedly can determine a person's gender, level of education, and whether two pieces of writing originated from the same person. Critics say that teens who accept sex offers from adults are usually aware that they're adults - deception isn't the problem.
FirstPrevious...1...NextLast