Sort by:
  1. Added Oct 10, 2007 by aseldow
    The justices split 4-4 on the case, which means a lower court ruling siding with former Viacom executive Tom Freston remains in place. Lower courts had ruled in favor of Freston against New York City's board of education, saying the city must pay for educating learning-disabled students in private schools, even when they don't first give the public school system a chance.
  2. Added Oct 10, 2007 by dan.donato
    The justices split 4-4 on the case, which means a lower court ruling siding with former Viacom executive Tom Freston remains in place. Lower courts had sided with Freston against New York City's board of education, saying the city must pay for educating the learning-disabled student, even though he had been enrolled in private school. The student's parents had insisted that public schools were unable to meet the child's needs. His learning disabilities were diagnosed after he was enrolled in private school.
FirstPrevious...1...NextLast