Sort by:
  1. Added Sep 01, 2007 by brasst and 2 others
    personal catalog that can be shared with others
  2. Added Jun 19, 2007 by aseldow and 1 other
    Some papers on ontologies, folksonomies, and social bookmarking
  3. Added Jun 18, 2007 by aseldow
    Folksonomies and social tagging are an often cited example of Web 2.0, but what are they actually? How does social bookmarking differ from conventional bookmarks and what do folksonomies constitute of?
  4. Added Jun 18, 2007 by aseldow
    Tagging, folksonomy, distributed classification, ethnoclassification—however it is labelled, the concept of users creating and aggregating their own metadata is gaining ground on the internet. This literature review briefly defines the topic at hand, looking at current implementations and summarizing key advantages and disadvantages of distributed classification systems with reference to prominent folksonomy commentators.
  5. Added Apr 04, 2007 by mniemitz
    AquaBrowser Library® is a revolutionary library search tool and interface developed specifically for the library user to gather the most valuable information in the easiest manner.
  6. Added Mar 29, 2007 by clillvik and 2 others
    C&RL News, February 2007 Vol. 68, No. 2: Suppose you are starting to research a current topic—wikis in the library or new developments in electronic resources management, perhaps. You have some current books on the subject and have printed a few articles off the library databases. But much of the most current information is on the Internet, in blogs and news articles, or maybe on the sites of libr
  7. Added Mar 12, 2007 by clillvik and 3 others
    This is an extensive post, revealing the results of a statistical comparison between Amazon and LibraryThing tags, and exploring why tagging has turned out relatively poorly for Amazon. I end by making concrete recommendations for ecommerce sites interested in making tagging work.
  8. Added Dec 13, 2006 by aseldow and 2 others
    Comparing social tagging and subject cataloguing; this paper identifies the points of similarity and difference that obtain between these two kinds of information organization frameworks. The subsequent comparative analysis of the parts of these frameworks points to the nature of indexing as an authored, personal, situational, and referential act, where differences in discursive placement divide..
  9. Added Aug 10, 2006 by aseldow and 1 other
    By: Gordon-Murnane, Laura, Searcher, 10704795, Jun2006, Vol. 14, Issue 6 Database: Academic Search Premier
  10. Added Jun 14, 2006 by aseldow and 1 other
    Neat blog that the UPenn librarians maintain to discuss their emerging technology integrations.
FirstPrevious...12...NextLast